Friday, April 19, 2019

The Test of Power?

We have learned by sad experience that it is the nature and disposition of almost all men, as soon as they get a little authority, as they suppose, they will immediately begin to exercise unrighteous dominion.1
How fascinating that “the nature and disposition of almost all men ... to exercise unrighteous dominion” has been so thoroughly confirmed.


How to Deprogram a Sociopath: A Proposal (Time 39:37)
[Davi Barker: Authoritarian Sociopathy] at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ceyvTFr5vtU&feature=youtu.be 2
Most of us probably think we are immune to the “spirit of power” that seems to overtake those who rise to, or are appointed or elected to positions of power; a spirit that oft envelopes even those who merely simulate power scenarios as was illustrated in this video3 presented several years ago; a spirit also described here:
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.4
Two of the great tests in this world, documented déjà vu on déjà vu, are the test of wealth and the test of power, both of which foster and flourish in secret combinations.5

Too bad more of us do not recognize the expressions of power in ourselves and in those we elevate to power, and why most seldom manifest in office what was promised in campaign. If there were more awareness and exposure of the dark "nature and disposition" of power in almost every human heart, maybe more of us would pass the test.

A recommended place to achieve greater awareness: The Powers That Be: Theology for a New Millennium by Walter Wink.

-----------------------------/
1. Doctrine and Covenants | Section 121:39 (bold emphasis added)
2. See also at https://www.corbettreport.com/interview-1439-davi-barker-on-authoritarian-sociopathy/ or Davi Barker, Authoritarian Sociopathy (Time 52:19 at https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=davi+barker
3. https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2014/03/truly-afflicted-with-riches.html
4. New Testament | Ephesians 6:12
5. Book of Mormon | Ether 8:22-23 ~ And whatsoever nation shall uphold such secret combinations, to get power and gain, until they shall spread over the nation, behold, they shall be destroyed; ... Wherefore, O ye Gentiles, it is wisdom in God that these things should be shown unto you, that thereby ye may repent of your sins, and suffer not that these murderous combinations shall get above you, which are built up to get power and gain—and the work, yea, even the work of destruction come upon you, yea, even the sword of the justice of the Eternal God shall fall upon you, to your overthrow and destruction if ye shall suffer these things to be. (Bold emphasis added.)
Book of Mormon | Ether 11:15 ~ And it came to pass that there arose a rebellion among the people, because of that secret combination which was built up to get power and gain; (Bold emphasis added.)

Tuesday, April 9, 2019

A Shift in Church Records?


With the April 4, 2019 announcement that—
These changes [new policies] do not represent a shift in Church doctrine related to marriage or the commandments of God in regard to chastity and morality1
—the question immediately comes to mind: What of church records? What will the changes require?—necessitate? What options must the Certificates of Record now offer? What of Family History and other records and lists?
Parents of child:
1. Father: ___________________
    Mother: __________________

2. Father: ___________________
    Father: ___________________

3. Mother: ___________________
    Mother: ___________________

4. Other: ____________________
    Other: ____________________

Other Records / Software:
1. Husband: __________________
    Wife: _____________________

2. Husband: __________________
    Husband: __________________

3. Wife: _____________________
    Wife: _____________________

4. Other: _____________________
    Other: _____________________

Just wondering about a lot of things.

-----------------------------------------/
1. https://www.mormonnewsroom.org/article/first-presidency-messages-general-conference-leadership-session-april-2019#oaks

Tuesday, March 19, 2019

“To Make the Known Unknown”?


If there is a succinct phrase that could describe the condition of our day, it might be the title to this post.
"To make the known unknown."*
God's promise has always been the reverse: to make the unknown known to those who seek:
Call unto me, and I will answer thee, and shew thee great and mighty things, which thou knowest not. (Old Testament | Jeremiah 33:3)

Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you: (New Testament | Matthew 7:7)
BUT in this age we have become inundated with fake news, false flags, propaganda, and psy-ops orchestrated and funded by the very powers that claim to have our best interests and security at heart. We have fallen into an age where that which is known to millions is ignored by millions as though what they know (what witness after witness has revealed at risk to life and limb) were completely unknown. As if we cannot bring ourselves to see, hear, or speak about what is being done in our world. As if we cannot remember:
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. (New Testament | Ephesians 6:12)
This Déjà Vu blog has tried, over the past decade, to help keep conscious that which is known (has been witnessed time after time) about the forces and fabrications of the adversary; a consciousness of not resisting evil with evil but of resisting the powers with awareness, prayer, exposure, and invitations to redemption.

Here is a brief excerpt detailing our current circumstance from “Engaging the Powers” by Walter Wink:
The world-atmosphere teaches us what we can value. In the Domination System generally, it teaches us to value power. In any particular society, however, power is given specific shape by the peculiar conditions of the time. What characterizes our society is the unique value ascribed to money. People in every age have coveted wealth, but few societies have lionized the entrepreneur as ours does. Aristocratic societies—and most societies have been aristocratic—have tended to look down on acquisitiveness and to despise merchants. Modern capitalism, by contrast, has made wealth the highest value. Our entire social system has become an "economy"; no earlier society would have characterized itself thus. Profit is the highest social good. Consumerism has become the only universally available mode of participation in modern society. The work ethic has been replaced by the consumption ethic, the cathedral by the skyscraper, the hero by the billionaire, the saint by the executive, religion by ideology. The Kingdom of Mammon exercises constraint by invisible chains and drives its slaves with invisible prods. (How rare it is for rich people to say, "I have enough.") But Mammon is wiser in its way than the dictator, for money enslaves not by force but by love.

The world-atmosphere also teaches us what to see. "One can say not only that as individuals we live within a sociocultural organism but also that the sociocultural organism lives within us. Not only are we individual units within an organized society, but organized society is represented and incarnated within our brains." Whatever the System tells our brains is real is what we are allowed to notice; everything else must be ignored. "We give the system the power to make the known unknown."[*] Thus we are taught to mistrust our own experiences.

Every observation is a directed observation, that is, an observation for or against a point of view. Every mind is a "contaminated mind," a mind constructed of a network of suppositions and assumptions. All descriptions are paradigm-conditioned and value-laden. A Skinnerian and a Freudian will not only describe the same behavior in incompatible ways, but their conceptual frameworks actually cause them to see different behaviors. The observed behavior is different in each case. The result of this limitation on what we are allowed to see is a miniaturization of our living world.

These limitations of sight are to a degree merely a consequence of finitude. But to some extent they are also the result of a system that is deliberately blinding us to God's true intent for humanity:

Walter Wink. Engaging the Powers: Discernment and Resistance in a World of Domination (Kindle Locations 812-829). Kindle Edition. [ All bold emphasis has been added, and 3 footnote references omitted.]
---------------------/
* Wink's Footnote 12: Anne Wilson Schaef, When Society Becomes an Addict (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1987), 108.  at Walter Wink. Engaging the Powers: Discernment and Resistance in a World of Domination (Kindle Locations 4926-4927). Kindle Edition.

Saturday, March 9, 2019

"Nonviolence for the Violent"?


The great déjà vu of history must be the continuity of domination systems and the violence that sustains them. When we look at our inner and outer selves and at the systems we have established, almost all—whatever the “altruistic” origins—seem to rapidly devolve into domination systems, even within our families.

But perhaps the greatest domination system in history is the deep state fronted by US, our secretive agencies, and coerced allies. When we finally open our eyes and ears to the depth of murder and mayhem that we have resorted to in pursuit of power, gain, and so-called security, the crimes and corruptions of the socialist/communist system will pale in comparison to those of the secretive, hypocritical Babylonian system1 that we have embraced and energized.

The violence that has been perpetrated by this nation that was born in such hope and promise is tragic beyond description. Many have tried to witness what they have seen and experienced, but so few USians want the truth; but for those who do, what do WE do so that we do not mirror the violence?

Perhaps we can learn vital lessons from 2000 years ago—not from the supposed wimp Jesus, but from the radical, outspoken Jesus who used the domination system against itself in nonviolent ways. Perhaps it is time to reassess what Jesus really intended with turn the other cheek; with let him have thy cloak also; with go the second mile.2



Walter Wink (1): Nonviolence for the Violent (Time 8:11) at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gC8pffvX1to&list=PL2oZnDZepAhfBN8Zg9pFGzaN_WoPyfvSw
Part 2 (Time 9:24) at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RUc3lAhJs8c&list=PL2oZnDZepAhfBN8Zg9pFGzaN_WoPyfvSw&index=2
Part 3 (Time 8:40) at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UejcCTSwJ6I&list=PL2oZnDZepAhfBN8Zg9pFGzaN_WoPyfvSw&index=3
Part 4 (Time 8:58) at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9buysvm0SGE&list=PL2oZnDZepAhfBN8Zg9pFGzaN_WoPyfvSw&index=4
Part 5 (Time 10:01) at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_1jpwHsRus&list=PL2oZnDZepAhfBN8Zg9pFGzaN_WoPyfvSw&index=5
For latter-day ideas for nonviolent resistance, check out Gene Sharp and his advocates.3

Oh, that we had a passionate, repentant Jonah4 preaching with power to a seeing, hearing US!

--------------------/
1. The REAL nemesis of Zion:  https://dejavu-timestwo.blogspot.com/2017/08/conflation.html ; https://dejavu-timestwo.blogspot.com/2014/12/deception-inc.html ; https://dejavu-timestwo.blogspot.com/2015/01/arms-race.html ; https://dejavu-timestwo.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-sound-of-trump.html ; https://dejavu-timestwo.blogspot.com/2010/02/economics-of-babylon.html ; https://dejavu-timestwo.blogspot.com/2009/12/economics-of-jesus.html
2. New Testament | Matthew 5:39–41 ~ 39 But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil [with evil?]: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also. 40 And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloke also. 41 And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him twain.
3. The secret to effective nonviolent resistance | Jamila Raqib (Time 8:57 TED talk) at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIpgrZ8yS-Q ; Gene Sharp - Hardtalk (Time 23:47) at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wZESH4D1ik&t=581s
4. https://dejavu-timestwo.blogspot.com/2018/09/why-was-jonah-so-very-angry.html

Tuesday, February 19, 2019

"That we do ALWAYS remember ..." (what?)


Photo credit below
Most every Sunday, many of us say amen to words1 we give little thought to during the following week; and after that amen, we partake of bread and water in remembrance and witness of those words—one of which is ALWAYS.2 Yet, if we could count our thoughts even on the day of our witness, how would our remembrance be graphed?

Below, in the footnotes,3 is a small sampling of what has become, recognized in this age of digital devices, as the foremost observable obsession / addiction / attraction / distraction of perhaps any age of world history—the ubiquitous smartphone: that thing millions always remember; that millions nigh panic over if mis- or displaced; that thing that commands attention and remembrance.

So how do we always remember Him in the face of such unrelenting distraction? For starters we can acknowledge our failing—we can raise our consciousness to a new level of knowing how little we are aware of His presence (and His desire to be present) in the hours, minutes, seconds, and nanoseconds of our lives. In this world of overload, stress, distraction, enticement, addiction, disappointment, etc., etc., (weapons of Babylon), we can raise our sights to look for God everywhere in:
»  sunrises, sunsets, and stars
»  great rivers and small streams
»  flowers and trees; fishes and forests
»  birds and bees; babies and bladders
»  fingers and toes; eyes, ears, noses, and throats
»  shoulders and spines; elbows and knees
»  breasts, bile, and bowels
»  seeds, soil, sap, and saliva
»  language, laughter, and lymph nodes
»  dreams, decimals, and deliverance
»  electricity,4 eclipses, endurance, and electrons
»  parsley, paper, protons, and prayers
»  water, waves, wisdom, and wonders
»  mother earth and mother hens
»  songs, seasons, and  sabbaths
»  hugs, healing, and helping hands
»  repentance, refinement, and redemption
»  sabbaths, sufferings, and salvation
»  faith, hope, and charity
»  (to an infinity of observation)
Indeed (and thought), the places to find and remember Him are innumerable and endless. God can even be found and remembered (with consciousness) in the wonders of the smartphone, but He is far more than digital images, data, or devices.

Perhaps the best place to ALWAYS REMEMBER HIM is in gratitude—for every small (to large) favor, serendipity, protection, inspiration, gift, blessing, and help.

How many times, in a day, can we say: I thank Thee5 ... ?
In every thing give thanks: for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus concerning you.
(New Testament | 1 Thessalonians 5:18)

VERILY I say unto you my friends, fear not, let your hearts be comforted; yea, rejoice evermore, and in everything give thanks;
(Doctrine and Covenants | Section 98:1)
-----------------/
1. Doctrine and Covenants | Section 20:77 ~ ... and witness unto thee, O God, the Eternal Father, that they are willing to take upon them the name of thy Son, and always remember him ... (See also, Book of Mormon | Moroni 4:3)
Doctrine and Covenants | Section 20:79 ~ ... that they may witness unto thee, O God, the Eternal Father, that they do always remember him, ... (See also, Book of Mormon | Moroni 5:2)
2. Always ~ adverb: 1) every time; on every occasion; without exception; 2) all the time; continuously; uninterrupted; 3) forever
3. A small sampling:
▪  Signs and Symptoms of Cell Phone Addiction ~
https://www.psychguides.com/guides/signs-and-symptoms-of-cell-phone-addiction/
▪  Understanding Cell Phone Addiction
https://www.psychalive.org/cell-phone-addiction/
▪  Phone Addiction Is Real -- And So Are Its Mental Health Risks ~
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alicegwalton/2017/12/11/phone-addiction-is-real-and-so-are-its-mental-health-risks/#12eabb7313df
▪  21 Signs You’re Way Too Addicted to Your Phone ~
https://www.rd.com/advice/relationships/cell-phone-addiction/
▪  Smartphone addiction could be changing your brain ~
https://www.cnn.com/2017/11/30/health/smartphone-addiction-study/index.html
▪  Your brain on digital technology ~
https://www.cbc.ca/radio/ideas/your-brain-on-digital-technology-1.4562541
▪  Addicted to your smartphone? How to start kicking the habit ~
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/addicted-to-your-smartphone-how-to-start-kicking-the-habit-1.4483835
4. If you question electricity, check out The Electric Universe at https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/daily-tpod/tpods-of-2019-archive/ ; https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/ ; and https://www.electricuniverse.info/
5, Why I prefer “Thee” (being the intimate form and not, as some allege, a formal, respectful form); see http://dejavu-timestwo.blogspot.com/2010/12/language-of-prayer.html

Photo CreditPhoto by Sara Kurfeß on Unsplash

Saturday, February 9, 2019

More Skimmed Milk?


Have we become:
... such as have need of milk, and not of strong meat. For every one that useth milk is unskilful in the word of righteousness: for he is a babe. But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, even those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil1?
I found some nourishing meat the other day in a book called Fresh Eyes on Jesus' Parables by Doug Newton. If anyone is hungering for meat in a menu of reduced calories, Newton is worth considering.

Previous Skimmed Milk: http://dejavu-timestwo.blogspot.com/2010/10/skimmed-milk.html

Added Feb. 11, 2019

More Meat: Fresh Eyes on Jesus' Miracles by Doug Newton. Reading Newton is, for me, like breaking free from a diet of repetitive, recycling scripture sameness that has become habitual. As he says:
What if the commonplace understanding of a Bible story or a well-known Scripture passage is the very thing keeping us from seeing the text in a new, life-transforming way?

We all find ourselves facing this problem when we study the Bible. We believe Scripture is living and powerful. But many of us, after a genuine encounter with God followed by faithful Bible study and many sermons, became so familiar with Scripture that it lost its impact. The Bible became a book of riddles to be solved. Once we “figured out what a passage meant,” we checked it off and moved on. We’ve seen these stories too many times, and everyone who’s been a Christian for even a year or two knows how that voracious appetite for the Word quickly fades.

Pastors and Bible teachers craft a message from a particular text, and the lesson they convey becomes the way we understand the passage from that point on. Within a few short years, it feels like we’re hearing the same thing over and over again. We begin to approach the Bible with less zip and zeal. Familiarity may not always breed contempt, but it does tend to breed complacency.2
----------------------/
1. New Testament | Hebrews 5:12-14 ~ For when for the time ye ought to be teachers, ye have need that one teach you again which be the first principles of the oracles of God; and are become such as have need of milk, and not of strong meat. For every one that useth milk is unskilful in the word of righteousness: for he is a babe. But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, even those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil. See also:
Old Testament | Isaiah 28:9 ~ Whom shall he teach knowledge? and whom shall he make to understand doctrine? them that are weaned from the milk, and drawn from the breasts.
New Testament | 1 Corinthians 3:2 ~ I have fed you with milk, and not with meat: for hitherto ye were not able to bear it, neither yet now are ye able.
2. Newton, Doug. Fresh Eyes on Jesus' Miracles: Discovering New Insights in Familiar Passages (Kindle Locations 176-184). David C. Cook. Kindle Edition.

Saturday, January 19, 2019

Confusing?


Christ
by Heinrich Hofmann*
Do we confuse children—even adults—when we teach that Jesus, the Son of God, fulfills the prophecy of royal lineage through King David1 by way of his supposed mortal father, Joseph?2 And how do we reconcile the two vastly different lineages described for Joseph that are set forth in Matthew and Luke?3 In Matthew, Joseph's father is named Jacob; in Luke, Joseph's father is named Heli. The two different lineages are condensed as follows:
New Testament | Matthew 1:6-16 ~ David » Solomon » Roboam » Abia » Asa » Josaphat » Joram » Ozias » Joatham » Achaz » Ezekias » Manasses » Amon » Josias » Jechonias » Salathiel » Zorobabel » Abiud » Eliakim » Azor » Sadoc » Achim » Eliud » Eleazar » Matthan » Jacob » Joseph the husband of Mary, of  whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.

New Testament | Luke 3:23-31 ~ David » Nathan » Mattatha » Menan » Melea » Eliakim » Jonan » Juda » Simeon » Levi » Matthat » Jorim » Eliezer » Jose » Er » Elmodam » Cosam » Addi » Melchi » Neri » Salathiel » Zorobabel » Rhesa » Joanna » Juda » Joseph » Semei » Mattathias » Maath » Nagge » Esli » Naum » Amos » Mattathias » Joseph » Janna » Melchi » Levi » Matthat » Heli » Joseph (as was supposed) » Jesus
Scholars and others4 have tried to solve the puzzle by asserting that Luke really describes the lineage of Mary descended from David's son Nathan, whereas Matthew describes Joseph's lineage through David's son Solomon. Others have sought answers in a Levirate marriage scenario, and so forth.

But, several years ago, I heard a Jewish / Christian speaker maintain that Matthew's genealogy listing was really Mary's because some unknown scribe had changed “Joseph the father of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ” to what we now have in Matthew 1:16 as “Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.”5

This “maternal ancestry in Matthew” does not seem to be as widely considered, perhaps because some believe the David»Solomon line raises the Jeconiah/Jeconias curse problem.6 However “Jews for Jesus” gives a thorough and thoughtful consideration of this issue.7 Also, if royal lineage is of prophetic importance, does not that royal lineage come only through King Solomon's line?8 Did we ever hear of King Nathan? And what an interesting "scribal amendment(?)"—to create one of the major objections to Jesus as Messiah for mainstream Judaism.9

And speaking of Mary's inclusion in the lineage (and why shouldn't she be as the ONLY mortal in the final equation?): is it not divinely(?) apt—since the Jesus story is so disruptive of traditions and expectations—to insert a female name into the male line just before that disruptive Jesus? And what's also of (disruptive?) interest are the references in Matthew's full lineage list of 5 women (4 of whom might be termed infamous).10

We're not likely to definitively solve this lineage puzzle with the resources we have at present, but by acknowledging discrepancies and considering possible answers, are we not “helping the thinker believe; helping the believer think” which is the insightful mantra of the itinerant group RZIM?11 Of course, it's difficult to cover all matters in limited time, but deep questions are fundamental to learning: just ask Alma12; just re-read the Gospels looking for all the deep questions Jesus asked and answered.

-----------------------/
1. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genealogy_of_Jesus (Section: "Fulfillment of prophecy")
2. New Testament 2019: Come Follow Me—For Individuals and Families, p. 8 (Matthew 1:1-17)
3. New Testament | Matthew 1:6–16 ~ 6 And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Urias;
7 And Solomon begat Roboam; and Roboam begat Abia; and Abia begat Asa;
8 And Asa begat Josaphat; and Josaphat begat Joram; and Joram begat Ozias;
9 And Ozias begat Joatham; and Joatham begat Achaz; and Achaz begat Ezekias;
10 And Ezekias begat Manasses; and Manasses begat Amon; and Amon begat Josias;
11 And Josias begat Jechonias and his brethren, about the time they were carried away to Babylon:
12 And after they were brought to Babylon, Jechonias begat Salathiel; and Salathiel begat Zorobabel;
13 And Zorobabel begat Abiud; and Abiud begat Eliakim; and Eliakim begat Azor;
14 And Azor begat Sadoc; and Sadoc begat Achim; and Achim begat Eliud;
15 And Eliud begat Eleazar; and Eleazar begat Matthan; and Matthan begat Jacob;
16 And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.
New Testament | Luke 3:23–31 ~ 23 And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli,
24 Which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi, which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Janna, which was the son of Joseph,
25 Which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Amos, which was the son of Naum, which was the son of Esli, which was the son of Nagge,
26 Which was the son of Maath, which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Semei, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Juda,
27 Which was the son of Joanna, which was the son of Rhesa, which was the son of Zorobabel, which was the son of Salathiel, which was the son of Neri,
28 Which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Addi, which was the son of Cosam, which was the son of Elmodam, which was the son of Er,
29 Which was the son of Jose, which was the son of Eliezer, which was the son of Jorim, which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi,
30 Which was the son of Simeon, which was the son of Juda, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Jonan, which was the son of Eliakim,
31 Which was the son of Melea, which was the son of Menan, which was the son of Mattatha, which was the son of Nathan, which was the son of David,
4. A few examples:
https://zondervanacademic.com/blog/why-are-jesus-genealogies-in-matthew-and-luke-different/
https://www.allaboutjesuschrist.org/lineage-of-jesus-faq.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genealogy_of_Jesus
https://jewsforjesus.org/publications/issues/issues-v05-n06/the-genealogy-of-the-messiah/
https://www.gotquestions.org/Jesus-genealogy.html
https://thejesusquestion.org/2015/12/21/the-two-genealogies-of-jesus-the-curse-of-jeconiah-and-the-royal-line-of-david/
5. See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genealogy_of_Jesus at section: "Maternal ancestry in Matthew"
6. https://jewsforjesus.org/publications/issues/issues-v05-n06/the-genealogy-of-the-messiah/ (see particularly section: "The lineage of Joseph, Jesus’ father" and thereafter) https://zondervanacademic.com/blog/why-are-jesus-genealogies-in-matthew-and-luke-different/
7. https://jewsforjesus.org/answers/the-problem-of-the-curse-on-jeconiah-in-relation-to-the-genealogy-of-jesus-issues-prophecy/
8. Consider https://jewsforjudaism.org/knowledge/articles/must-the-messiah-be-a-descendent-of-solomon/ ; https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/1714864/jewish/Is-the-Messiah-a-Descendant-of-King-Solomon.htm
9. http://www.jewishanswers.org/ask-the-rabbi-category/the-basics-of-judaism/the-messiah/who-is-the-messiah/?p=1063
10. https://www.wycliffe.org/blog/posts/unlikely-heroes-the-women-of-matthew-1; https://www.biblestudytools.com/blogs/the-good-book-blog/women-in-jesus-genealogy.html ; http://holinesstoday.org/meet-five-unique-women-in-jesus-family-tree
11. RZIM: https://www.rzim.org/
12. Book Of Mormon | Alma 32

*Image attribution: Heinrich Hofmann [Public domain]
Representation of Jesus Christ, extracted from the painting "Christ And The Rich Young Ruler" by Hoffmann, June 1889
This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights.
This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 100 years or less.
Page URL: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Christ,_by_Heinrich_Hofmann.jpg
File URL: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cd/Christ%2C_by_Heinrich_Hofmann.jpg