Showing posts with label Sovereignty. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sovereignty. Show all posts

Thursday, April 12, 2018

Echoes from before Eden?


Recently, a friend recommended I listen to George Kavassilas. I had encountered him and the emerging sovereigntist movement several years ago and posted an observation1 at that time. As I listened to several of his presentations, I wondered if some real truths within spiritual sovereignty had become entwined also with ancient dissembling. One writer describes sovereignty thus:
For a growing number of people focusing on matters of consciousness, sacred knowledge and personal freedom, the reclamation of the word sovereign has become profoundly consequential. Within this paradigm, to recognize oneself as a sovereign being is to acknowledge one’s own total spiritual autonomy and unconditional entitlement to self‐determination. It is a primary avowal of oneself as a free and natural human being — not a serf, a subject, a corporate entity, or even a citizen. No persons or man‐made laws have any jurisdiction whatsoever over a sovereign being. This is all very alarming for any empire that secretly prefers its populace to feel toothless.2
So as I listened to an online conversation3 between Ole Dammegard (researcher at https://www.lightonconspiracies.com/) and George Kavassilas (author and sovereigntist from iaminfinite.love and weareinfinite.love) my questions increased. Ole described his years of research exposing the role-plays, school-plays, and conspiracies that many have chosen to participate in for a variety of reasons: role-plays, school-plays, and conspiracies that have kept much of the world in a state of disinformation, confusion, distraction, disruption, and violence. George's summary of Ole's information was to acknowledge that we live in a “system that only seeks to completely molest and suppress and subdue and apprehend humanity.”4

In his conclusion, Ole invited players in “the system” to come out — to whistle-blow, as it were —promising support and as much protection as possible. HOWEVER, the ending exchange5 was this:
George: “Yah, because we're not someone who seeks justice. You see, justice is glorified revenge. See. We don't seek justice. We seek healing, forgiveness, and just moving forward in life; and so thank you. You [the evil-doers] played a wonderful role. It's like, you guys were good [at doing bad]. We wanted the best [opposition]. We got the best. You guys, we couldn't have asked for a better job to challenge us in the way that you've challenged us. It's just been amazing. They're really good at what they do. And ah, ... 'cause you know, we've done it [played the wicked role] in previous times. So you know, we were pretty good at it too. We've played those roles as well in stages in our journey through this amazing universe; so these guys are pretty good too. So it's been a fantastic exchange I'll say, it's been an incredible co-created experience from both sides; and ah, from all sides. And it's now time to bring this play to an end and get on with life.
Ole: Time to shake hands, have a shower, and a cold beer and say thank you for this. It's been a good game.
George: Beautiful. Well said, Ole.
So with all this exposure to massive fraud and injustice in the world, GK held to his dogma(?) that “justice is glorified revenge.” But what if Justice is the right chamber of the heart of the great Creator with Love being the left chamber? Or what if Justice is the right hand and Love the left hand? What if nothing can endure without Justice and nothing can develop to its potential without Love?

I find this denial of Justice (and Judgment) an incredible and devastating déjà vu — as if I have heard all this before and witnessed pre-mortal friends deny Justice because they bought the notion that Love can exist without Justice.

Could this have been the major contention in the war in Heaven?6 the supposed irreconcilability of Justice and Love in a new world of opposites and opposition? in a high-risk venture of combining immortal spirit with mortal flesh (unrefined, addictive- and decay-prone matter)? in the universal / defining trial of how one will use or abuse perceived power over such matter and over others?

Was not “love” the purported motive for Lucifer's claim that he would “redeem all mankind, that one soul shall not be lost”?7 Was not the expectation / pride of entitlement without comparable experience or development the basis of his claim to God's glory?8

I realize that GK and similar sovereigntists do not believe in scripture or the God of scripture,9 but where is the love and respect for others, if one just moves forward with one's own life (healing and forgiving, which is right), BUT leaving the arsonist, rapist, thief, attempted murderer, extortionist, liar, etc. etc. free to carry on his / her stock-in-trade against others because justice is “glorified revenge”?

Where is the sovereignty in enduring repeated tortures as GK claims he experienced? Where is the reality (sanity?) in saying “thank you” to brutal adversaries for playing “a wonderful role” as if this were all a play (game?) with script readers and (crisis?) actors. Where is the remorse — the sorrow — for having played the psychopathic role in some previous incarnation? Why the pride in having been amongst the best in “playing” a human without conscience?

It is all more déjà vu than I can adequately express.

---------------------------/
1. Footnote 2 at http://dejavu-timestwo.blogspot.ca/2015/02/the-hijacking-of-hierarchy.html
2. http://www.superconsciousness.com/topics/knowledge/power-sovereign-spirit
3. https://www.lightonconspiracies.com/super-woo-radio-australia/
4. Part II circa min. 56:20+
5. Part II: circa min. 58.00+
6. New Testament | Revelation 12:7 ~ And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,
7. Pearl of Great Price | Moses 4:1 ~ AND I, the Lord God, spake unto Moses, saying: That Satan, whom thou hast commanded in the name of mine Only Begotten, is the same which was from the beginning, and he came before me, saying—Behold, here am I, send me, I will be thy son, and I will redeem all mankind, that one soul shall not be lost, and surely I will do it; wherefore give me thine honor.
8. Old Testament | Isaiah 14:12-14 ~ How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning!  how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.
9. Book of Mormon | Alma 42:15-22 ~ And now, the plan of mercy could not be brought about except an atonement should be made; therefore God himself atoneth for the sins of the world, to bring about the plan of mercy, to appease the demands of justice, that God might be a perfect, just God, and a merciful God also. Now, repentance could not come unto men except there were a punishment, which also was eternal as the life of the soul should be, affixed opposite to the plan of happiness, which was as eternal also as the life of the soul. Now, how could a man repent except he should sin? How could he sin if there was no law? How could there be a law save there was a punishment? Now, there was a punishment affixed, and a just law given, which brought remorse of conscience unto man. Now, if there was no law given—if a man murdered he should die—would he be afraid he would die if he should murder? And also, if there was no law given against sin men would not be afraid to sin. And if there was no law given, if men sinned what could justice do, or mercy either, for they would have no claim upon the creature? But there is a law given, and a punishment affixed, and a repentance granted; which repentance, mercy claimeth; otherwise, justice claimeth the creature and executeth the law, and the law inflicteth the punishment; if not so, the works of justice would be destroyed, and God would cease to be God.

Thursday, March 8, 2018

A Few Questions for Anarchists and Sovereigntists*


▪ what should we think of someone who, in their first week of dental school, began signing their name as Dr. or appended D.D. to their name? Would doing so in their third year before graduation be more acceptable? Should there be any rules or tests at all for anyone who considers they have sufficient knowledge, interest, or skill to take up a skilled profession?

▪ when was it ever safe or wise to tell an individual (who has been the alleged victim of a violent act) that s/he has the inalienable right under Natural Law to act as witness, prosecutor, jury, judge, and executioner?1

▪ if one only acknowledges the “I / ME” of a 4-quadrant reality,2 what is the likelihood of true growth in consciousness?

▪ does the whole ever manifest as greater than the sum of its parts? And how is the individual holon to relate to the social holon if the social holon is denied?3

▪ how does order flow from your definition of freedom (i.e., no rules or laws4) when moral / emotional / spiritual / cognitive / social / etc. intelligence runs the gamut from 2-year old tantrums to licentious Crowleys to compassionate Mother Teresas? And if one denies the clear déjà vu on déjà vu demonstration of states, stages, lines, levels, grades, and growth in all nature, including human nature, what does that say about one's state of awareness, internal and external?

▪ if hierarchy, both developmental and corrupted, manifest in almost all we see in this world, what level of consciousness can develop if all hierarchy is lumped together and rejected?5

▪ if the world has endured 70-plus years of global, psychopathic, mind-control experiments on tens-of-thousands of unwitting children and adults; if many accounts mirror patterns of powerful hypnosis and mind-control involving excruciating bouts of torture, abuse, pain, drugging, experimentation, reincarnation memories, alien abduction, and the creation of multiple personalities;6 if most of these accounts come out of power cultures like the military, the CIA, cults, pedophile rings, secret societies / combines, Hollywood, etc.; what should we make of “spiritual guides” who claim to have endured similar bouts of torture, abuse, alien abduction, etc., and survived them to become gurus of truth and advanced, galactic consciousness?7

▪ if there are increasing stages of complexity and differentiation in art, architecture, nature, and so forth, which must be maintained by even-higher orders of complexity to avoid entropy, how sovereign can one claim to be when increased complexity, growth, differentiation, and death are still ahead? Can one say, in honesty: “I am that I am,” or “I am God,” or “I am sovereign” when the reality is (or may be) “I am that I may become”?

▪ if an artist takes of materials already in existence and organizes them into a thing of beauty, can s/he not, in truth, say “I created this work of art”? Should we hold God to a different standard?

▪ what child was ever born into this world without two more-advanced, mediating, integrating elements from a father and a mother? And if life constitutes pre-mortal and post-mortal stages, are there mediators / elements at each stage? Is mediation a pattern? Are higher-order mediators required to help bring others from stage to stage of  increasing “consciousness” and integration?

▪ what is flesh and gross matter but a condition so beset by decay that no creature has ever escaped death nor ever will (despite hopes, plans, mechanizations, experiments, etc) without intervention by some higher order of law or being? And if “transcend and include” is a true principle of growth, enlightenment, and “evolution,” how do we transcend the flesh, yet include it, if there is death without resurrection?8

▪ how do anarchists and sovereigntists expect to handle the myriad psychopaths that history details in déjà vu upon déjà vu?9

▪ if psychopaths and order-followers are subhuman — below even animals — as Mark Passio alleges10 (with no chance of healing or redemption for primary psychopaths?), are we setting ourselves up to justify a holocaust of blame and annihilation because primary and secondary psychopaths will not come to a unity of consciousness? And if numbers matter, what should we do with the “toxic” numbers — the “garbage”11?

▪ could those who assert “As above, so below”; and “As below, so above,” be engaged in many false conflations concerning above / below, dual / non-dual, objective / subjective, obedience, law, freedom, purpose, agency, hierarchy, Law of Attraction, Natural Law,12 etc.?

▪ what would be the effect on agency, soul growth, and consciousness if there really was “The End of All Evil”13 in this world? And are many of man's alleged “truths” but recycled disputations — echoes from before Eden?14

--------------------/
* As in Mark Passio; George Kavassilas, Cameron Day, et al. Many of their criticisms of our world are valid, but what of their prescriptions? How close do any of us come to knowing the fine-line that is real truth and to recognizing that anything more or less than truth (adding to or taking away) cometh of evil? Do the number of studies that demonstrate how often "seeing, we see not and hearing, we hear not," give us a clue that awareness is a perpetual work in progress subject to distortions? and that forming theories (thinking) about what is real or true might not be sufficient if we refuse to see how such theories have played out in real history and will play out in real life?
1. (the logical conclusion of Mark Passio's contentions per several lectures, particularly about "Natural Law.") But see, New Testament | Matthew 7:3-5 ~ And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye? Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye.
2. Search Ken Wilber or integral theory on YouTube for some explanations.
3. Ken Wilber - individual and social holons (Time 15:12) at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RIc94LAQzM
4. (except for Natural Law, as some claim, though many others allege there is no inherent right or wrong to "govern" sovereign souls)
5.  http://dejavu-timestwo.blogspot.ca/search/label/Hierarchy
6. http://dejavu-timestwo.blogspot.ca/search/label/ChildSacrifice
7. Search YouTube for George Kavassilas interviews
8. http://dejavu-timestwo.blogspot.ca/2009/09/suppositions-from-sunday-afternoon.html
9. http://dejavu-times.blogspot.ca/search/label/Psychopathy
10. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wecRC5wIBEg&t=8678s ; http://dejavu-timestwo.blogspot.ca/2018/02/echoes-from-history.html
11. http://dejavu-timestwo.blogspot.ca/2014/03/natural-or-unnatural.html
12. Passio descriptive: circa min. 10:00 at Mark Passio All Religions Are Garbage, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HuI65AMFNg
13. Book by Jeremy Locke
14. New Testament | Revelation 12:7-9 ~ And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels, And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven. And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.